Hi!
We'd like to make you a proposition.
Imagine you'd been told a lie from the day you were born & didn't know it! How'd you at first react when someone finally told you that it was a lie? Right! You'd go in denial. That's the natural, automatic psychological human reaction, when for example police would tell you that your father is in fact a murderer. We'd like to present you now with a whole different view on something you've always held true. But we'd like to challenge you to at least try to consider the info presented here with OPEN mind, realising that your natural reaction will be just that.--Denial! Remember the fairytale about the emperor who had no clothes on!
OUR OTHER SITES:
|
Begin your re-orientation by downloading the most authorative book ever on "Great Sea Serpent" by Dutch crypto-zoologist A.C.Oudeman (1881) with reports of 187 appearances of seamonsters & 82 illustrations BEFORE YOU SEE THE PICS ... FIRST SOME STATEMENTS: 1. I'm NOT American! Nor a warmongering, Israel-worshipping, Evangelical Zionist, Neo-Con Bushite! I'm a follower of Jesus who deplores the Iraq war and the sad fact that much of U.S. & British Christianity is hijacked by Zionist infiltrators & unscriptural Scofield Bible brainwashed Dominionists. "My Kingdom", Jesus said, "is not of this world, else would my servants fight that I should not be delivered to the Jews!" God's Kingdom is in no way the USA nor Zionist "Israel." 2. I am no "Creationist!" It is unnecessary to scientifically prove your faith! Like other 'non-creationist' scientists as for example Newton, Einstein & others, I firmly believe in Intelligent Design & Creation, but can't prove it to you, as neither Creation nor Evolution were ever observed by any of us. Actually there are many more logical arguments for Creation & Intelligent Design! Just because someone doesn't have PhD after their name, doesn't mean they can't recognise a hoax if they see one! And I see a BIG one because.. 3. I DON'T for a second believe in Evolution! It's a religion worse than the one promoting the Earth was created on the back of an elephant! Evolutionists are often as bad as the Inquisition, super sensitive, bitterly persecuting people who rightly bust their legend back to "religion masquerading as science!" Evolution was never observed! The theory is as wobbly as the "Big Bang" theory which was recently demoted to the myth it always was, since an undisputed Quasar was discovered IN FRONT of a Galaxy, falsifying the first pillar of Big Bang ideology. Read about it here!
5. Dragons are NOT legends nor myths! Dragons have more historical documentation than "dinosaurs" that don't have any! Dragons also have LOADS of fossils to back them up for the plain & simple reason that since evolutionary highpriest Darwin started preaching, evolutionary religionists sponsored by Freemasons & New World Order Illuminists, hijacked our Dragon bones since 1875 & falsely re-christened them as scientifically correct "dinosaur fossils!" Of all things! Evilutionists even supplied these mythical Dinos with a 65 million year old myth that they were all supposed to have died out in a selective disaster that didn't even kill off the more sensitive other "branches" of the legendary "evolution tree!" BALONEY! BOVINE EXCREMENT! There is no archeological proof of such a feat, on the contrary... PEOPLE NOT VERY LONG AGO DID OBSERVE, SEE & FIGHT DRAGONS! Some were even eaten alive by them! 6. I'm dumbfounded by the ignorance on forums that link to us. Dudes unthinkingly parrotting what they see on TV, "learn" in school or from biased evolution spouting M.S. (Main Stream) Media, like National Geographic, Animal Planet, Discovery Channel, etc. They're so gullible & uncritical of what is fed to them & are often sown up in the forum's peerpressure by the "wise" guys who rule the forum & issue the watchword. These follower-types quickly aquiesce their true hunches that "something stinks in Denmark!" Wake up dude! You're being bullied "intellectually!" NOT?
| |
"A pickled dragon that looks as if it might once have flown around Hogwarts has been found in a garage in Oxfordshire. Yesterday the baby dragon, in a sealed 30in jar, was in the office of Allistair Mitchell, who runs a marketing company in Oxford. He was asked to investigate by his friend, David Hart, from Sutton Courtenay, who discovered it. A metal tin found with the dragon contained paperwork in old-fashioned German of the 1890s." "All they had to do in this case, which turned out to be another debunking hoax, to find out whether it was real or not, like alternative news www.rense.com noted: "A one minute X-ray will answer the question instantly. lf there is NO X-ray taken, we have a cover up. In all likelihood, an X-ray analysis has already been done..." --Editor Rense.com" Well, it turned out it was a hoax by a Media company and a Media prop-making company. The Smithsonian Institute is actually rumored to possess real dragon remains. Many real proofs & artifacts are lying around locked up in vaults somewhere, and some were actually destroyed by Evolutionary hijackers of Science! And how many genuine sightings have been denied & shoved off from frontpages of the hijacked media. Nor does any media ever want to investigate the little stuffed baby "plesiosaur" still in this Texas Creation museum until today! (scroll down)They should throw open the archives of all "natural" history museums to bring to light other proofs that Dragons were & still are ALIVE today, & that "Dinosaurs" are dead & finished!
![]() LONG LIVE THE DRAGON! MAY THEY BE RESTORED TO THEIR PROPER ANCIENT FEARFUL RESPECTABILITY! (Mean beasties though. Glad most of 'em are extinct now.) ![]() The pic is unrelated to this story but illustrates it well. THE LINDORM (Swedish for Dragon)
THE TARASQUE OF NERLUC
PICTURES TO MAKE YOU DOUBT YOUR PROGRAMMING?
| ||
IMAGINE THIS SMILING HEAD
ONE WEBSITE's EXCERPT: Descriptions of the creature varied so much that it is hard to be certain of any details, but it is agreed that the animal had a huge head, a beaklike snout, and tiny eyes. Variously described as 35 to 50 feet long, it seemed to have a narrow 20-foot-long neck. The California Academy of Sciences Museum studied the creature's skull and concluded that it was an extremely rare type of beaked whale--a whale so rare that it has only a Latin name, Berardius bairdi. Dr. Bernard Heuvelmans doubts whether any zoologist in the world would have been able to identify the carcass, since few, if any, have ever seen the animal alive. Not
everyone agreed with the beaked whale explanation. Many witnesses,
including some scientists, felt strongly that the animal was not a whale
or any known sea animal. For starters, the rare Berardius bairdi was
not known outside of British Columbian waters. Wallace noted that there was no bone in the Santa Cruz carcass as large as the backbone of a whale. This fact contradicted the whale theory, as did the fact that the tail of the unknown animal was only three feet long, too short and weak--Wallace felt--for an animal of the deep. Randall Reinstedt, in Mysterious Sea Monsters of California's Central Coast, writes that the monster was the talk of California's central coast for some time. The Santa Cruz Sentinel ran an eyewitness story of a horrific battle between a dozen or more sea lions and a gigantic fish that occurred shortly before the carcass was found on the beach. The Monterey Peninsula Herald described it as having a duck-shaped head and a tail like a whale. A Santa Cruz News story spoke of a head bigger than a barrel and eyes larger than abalones. Some pretty strange details crop up in eyewitness descriptions of the ambiguous monstrosity. One witness described the creature as having several pairs of elephantine legs on the body, including ivory toenails.
| EMERGE FROM THE OCEAN NEXT TO YOU!
There's no other credible explanation possible than that Marine dragons ("Plesiosaurs") are still living in the Pacific Ocean. The sardine fishermen there, often reported seeing creatures like this in the 1920-40 era. It was hardly reported in the media. Only in California. No explanation was ever given by "scientists" about the "65 million year extinct" creature! Marine Dragons are still living in the Pacific Ocean this century. Who knows! Soon we may see either misinformation sites or official scientific statements spring up on the web, telling us that "actually a few plesiosauri may have survived the famous Asteroid!" just to pacify and diffuse the issue. It wouldn't surprise me! We shall see! There have been many sightings of sea monsters by captains and crews over the last 5 centuries. some even swearing in their ship journals not to tell anybody as they were afraid to be ridiculed! Such stories are told in the book: "Shipwrecks and Sea Monsters", available from CSE of Kent Hovind, or here in pdf from Scientists did not immediately rush in to secure and study the body, as their duty is, but preferred to let it rot and wash away by the sea, and explain it away as some "extinct beaked whale!" I don't know if the California Academy of Sciences Museum secured the skull in 1925, because then they should still have it today! That is how you can tell the differrence between Evolutionary scientists and Intelligent Design scientists.
Honest naturaltist E.L. Wallace (See left column) after thorough study concluded that "it was a plesiosaur which had been preserved in glacial ice that had melted and moved south." He is at least an honest Evolutionist, finding a way to explain the time lag of 65 million years. "Preserved in North Pole ice for 65 million years." Now I'm sure North Pole ice is not 65 million years old. It gets recycled more often than that, and his evolutionist handlers knew that too.
OFFICIAL BLURP:
| ||
LAKE CHAMPLAIN DRAGON This is the US "Lake Champlain Monster" It is a living four-finned type of Plio- or Plesio-saur, or rather marine dragon, that has been spotted many times by local residents. This photo of the Lake Champlain monster was taken by Sandi Mansi in 1977. I saw Dr. Hovind's interview of her, a sincere lady. Thousands of people claim to have seen this creature in Lake Champlain, on the New York/Vermont border,and still as alive as Nessie. MEDIA REFUSE TO AIR CHAMPY FILM "Dear SCI FI, My friend and I taped this thing on Lake Champlain, which is near where we live. We were just fooling around near the shore when Brad spotted it. I turned on my camera and got the last part of it. We think it's Champ. We showed it to our friends and they think so, too. We sent it to Channel 3 but they never called us back." (See amazing footage at: http://www.scifi.com/happens/champ_footage.html Presstitutes (journalists who do it for money) & their editors do not want to upset their Masonic media bosses, evolutionary talking heads & Illuminati banking masters. See more on the subverted mainstream media deception. | A TURKISH 'LAKE VAN' MARINE DRAGON
There is a similarity here with a sea monster described in the historical book of Job in the Bible, called the Leviathan. Many of them inhabited the sea and had a serpentine look or image. It is described as a huge beast with scales so tight that air could not come between the sealing of the scales which were impossible to pry apart. See Dragon Chronicles | ||
MARINE DRAGON FISHED OUT OF These pictures of an apparent "Plesiosaur" or "Pliosaur" or Sea Dragon, were taken by Japanese fishermen on their fishing boat. They caught this baby with a net on a depth of about 100 meter, off the coast of New Zealand in 1977. It was 32 feet long and weighed 4000 pounds.
| THE
PACIFIC OCEAN NEW ZEALAND IN 1977
[Courtesy: Basking Shark Project] | ||
TECOLUTLA SEA DRAGON "Scientists" muttered "Narwhal" & "Rorque Whale" in Tecoluta Mexico and returned without thorough research to the US after bullying the mayor to bury this Dragon in the sand, who didn't! Alas, evol. scientists let the sea reclaim this unique piece of dragon evidence! Again!
The creature's skull (on the left) was preserved in the Maritime Museum at Tecolutla Mexico where it is still on show. The single picture of the creature is taken at the moment when the monster is hoisted with a crane onto a flatbed truck to take it to Tecolutla from where it first beached. Some believe it to be an extinct whale, others a megaraptor. IMHO, we believe the monster to be an unknown marine dragon, not unlike the Cadborasaurus maquette here.
| "JUST A RORQUAL WHALE??" Doesn't look like a whale to me, does it to you? More like a dragon head, neck & tusk bone, big eyes & mouth. But of course the "scientists" hardly investigated it & wanted the carcass buried as soon as possible! If it had been Lucy's hipbone or Neanderthaler's shoulderblade, it would have been frontpage news on National Geographic for ages & on every Newspaper Headline for a week! But No! This was not important! They said, "It has no scientific value to keep it around any longer! You need to bury it! -- NOW!
The scientists insisted that the creature be buried, as it was rotting rapidly and they felt they had nothing to learn from it. After a tough political battle, the mayor of Tecoluta overruled the "scientists" (God bless him) and said that the monster would be kept as a tourist attraction, despite its stunning smell. The scientists were satisfied with their explanation, which curiously did not address the existence of the creature's ton-size tusk. Now, how would you as evolutionary product explain the photo of such a creature? Right! As a marine "dinosaur!" A 65 million year old specimen of the trunk of the evolutionary tree, still alive in 1969? There's only one pic of this once-in-a-lifetime thing in Google pic search? Why! It should have been front page news for weeks & caused Revolutionary research! No! It was covered up literally with beach sand! As the blooming evo-lucy's always do! The "scientists" explained it away & "were statisfied" & wanted the thing buried asap & obviously even fought a political battle with the mayor to get their way! Thank God Mexico is not totally under U.S. control. The mayor kept it but evidently it finally rotted away slipped into the sea! | ||
|
MORE EVIDENCE OF LIVE THE
"MOKELE MBEMBE"
DRAGON FOR MORE on the Mokele Mbembe ANOTHER MONSTER CADAVER "BEAKED WHALE" STRIKES AGAIN! Suwarrow Island Sea Serpent 1899 The "beaked
whale" stop gap again, Business Day May 2, 1997 GLACIER ISLAND SEA DRAGON "The theory has been advanced," the article explained, "that the carcass is that of a prehistoric animal or reptile that has been preserved in the upper reaches of the Columbia glacier." Three days later, there was more news of the monster. "Monster in Ice Has Long Snout," proclaimed the New York Sun on November 28. "Confirm Finding of Pre-Historic Monster in Ice," read the headline in the (New York) Evening World. W. J. McDonald, supervisor of the Chugach National Forest, and a party of six others went to Glacier Island to investigate the report. Alaskans were skeptical until McDonald's party reached the site and reported back on their firsthand examination of the creature. McDonald described the animal as being shaped unlike any other creature known to have existed anywhere in the region, having "a long tail and tapering head, LIKE A DINOSAUR." McDonald's measurements were much more specific than the early reports: the head, described as being much like that of an elephant, was 59 inches long; the snout, from the end to the center of the forehead, was 39 inches long; the width of the snout at midsection was 11 inches with a 29-inch circumference; the widest part of the beast's skeleton was 38 inches; and the bizarre animal's length was 24 feet, with a 14-foot tail that started at the rib section. The Glacier Island Monster was estimated to have weighed 1,000 pounds. Charles Fort mentions the case very briefly in his book Lo!, in which he states that there was "considerable flesh" found. McDonald's report states that "only a small portion of the body had flesh on it." The flesh was described as resembling horse flesh. MacDonald believed that the creature became encased in the Columbia glacier and was carried to the sea with the movement of Glacier Island in the past centuries. However, as Fort pointed out in his mention of the case, just because something was found in ice doesn't mean that it was preserved in the ice for ages. The case dropped out of sight; paucity of follow-up articles on strange phenomena is common. The tantalizing case of the Glacier Island Monster carcass remains unexplained. EVER HEARD OF Memphré Magog? The legend of "Memphre" dates back to the days of Vikings and Indians, long before White Man settled the regions now known as Northeastern Vermont (The Northeast Kingdom) and the Eastern Townships of Quebec. DRAGON PICS
FOR DRACOFILES!
CREATURE from NINGBO CHINA. This creature was washed up against the outer sea wall in Ningbo China during a typhoon in July 2005. The local fishermen had never seen a creature like that before which they described as nearly 12 meters long and weighs around 2 tons, according to district sea and fishery bureau staff. reportedly has a long thin head and a snout nearly one meter long. Partly rotten, with its spine exposed, it has been impossible to identify, but has been described as having some hair, and orange stripes across a three to four-meter wide belly. The skull, which alone weighs over 100 kg, and coccyx of the creature have fallen from its body. Hu from Beilun's sea and fishery bureau said its overall structure means it's unlikely to be a fish, but the shape of its head is like a crocodile's. Local fishermen have their own ideas about what the animal is and where it came from. One called Li said it must have lived in the sea, because the skin of its chest is very much like that of many large sea animals, as thick and hard as rubber. According to another named Wang, it is very like an elephant seal, especially its mouth, and he said he once spotted elephant seals on a journey overseas five years ago. Many experts said that, being seriously rotten and deprived of lower limbs and tail, the monster is unlikely to be identified or to be made into a specimen. An expert from Ningbo University's sea creature research center who has not seen the animal said the possibility of it being a huge crocodile was slim, for they usually live in tropical freshwater. He also doubted that it could be an elephant seal, saying it would be hard to explain how one got to the subtropical East China Sea from polar waters.
THE HENDAYE SEA DRAGON REMAINS | DRAGONS NOW, & IN RECENT HISTORY. THE STUFFED FRENCH MUSEUM TANY DRAGON * Tanystropherous Dragons. * Ever heard of the "Komodo Dragon"? Its existence could not be THE ATTAKA CARCAS. May be a whale! AN AMERICAN MONSTER SITE EXCERPT The story of this mysterious carcass begins in January of 1950, following a horrific seventy-two hour gale, which ravaged the banks of the Gulf of Suez. On the day after the storm, Egyptian authorities discovered a humongous carcass decomposing on the beach. Almost immediately a team of scientists were dispatched to reveal the creature?s identity. Described as being "whale-like" in size, probably the most intriguing aspect of this beast - from a zoological standpoint - were its two, huge, walrus-like tusks, which protruded from either side of its large mouth. The animal also seemed to have blow hole atop its head, similar in structure to that of more traditional cetaceans. This has led some researchers to speculate that the animal may have been an unknown species of marine mammal. Some accounts even include eyewitness reports of a large, whale-like creature swimming in the gulf just ten days before the remains washed ashore. Although experts of the era could not positively identify this animal, it is common practice among modern skeptics to dismiss the creature as nothing more than a deteriorating whale corpse with its lower jaw bones splayed, creating the illusion of tusks. However, those who are willing to take the time and look at the additional evidence are forced to reevaluate that assumption. It seems both foolish and arrogant to assume that amateur (or professional) marine biologists can ascertain from a single, grainy, black and white photo what top Egyptian scientists were not able to while studying samples of the carcass in question; namely that the Ataka specimen is nothing more than a slightly decayed example of a common whale with its baleen exposed. OTHER MARINE MONSTER SIGHTINGS! OGOPOGO! SEAMONSTERS DRAGONS OR "DRIFTWOOD"? Of course there have been hoaxes sometimes, and actually the greatest hoaxes were (and still are!) perpetrated by wishful thinking evolutionists, creating skulls from pigteeth, monkeyjaws and pieces of human skulls, even treating them with barbiturates to give them the "jurassic look!" I am talking about "Homo Pitecantrophus" of "PROFESSOR DOCTOR" Dubois, who was so intent on burying Bible-based Christianity, that he searched for years in dry riverbeds in the scorching hot sun in Java for "ancient man!" As one fellow who was always positive said about the Devil. "Well you've got to admire his tenacity!"Bible bashing was actually Dubois' real historically documented intent and motivation. He was a slavish student of infamous Prof. Dr. Ernest Hackle, a real sheckel hackler, of Jekel of Hyde fame, a heckle raising reprobate "atheist" and antichrist rejectionist! ![]() Dubois got finally so utterly frustrated that he couldn't find anything, that he proceeded to fabricate his own socalled "Missing Link!" Ha! Now there's a real nitwit for you, plus all the nitwits that followed his hoax: the entire evolutionary "scientific" community that fell for his deception in one fell swoop, without any discrimination or skepsis whatsoever! Now that is a shameful thing for all these "learned men of the higher halls of wisdom", to so quickly give in to their lustful wishful thinking! That to me is a real joke, a real bellybumper! Ha! Don't get me wrong. I really appreciate the discriminating few and godly scientists who see through all that junk and even stand up against all the poppycock and bear the brunt of all that evilutionary "scientific" peer pressure & media ridicule, some even losing their jobs, because they are not conforming to the prevailing view of "science falsely socalled!"
Dragon Cadaver Found on Borneo? ANOTHER IGNORED SEA CARCASS IN CANADA! ANOTHER PLESIOSAUR BABY? Parton residents baffled by what was described as a "mini Loch Ness Monster" washed up on the beach.
| ||
AND NOW PICS OF... ALLEGED PTEROSAUR SHOT DOWN IN 1860. LIVING PTERODACTYLS IN
1870
These beasts, that American Indians call Thunderbirds, should have been dead for a 100 million years, but were found during the American Civil war! Pterodactyls arestill seen once in a while all over the world! Nah! At least two of these pics are real, if not all. Besides the lone little guy holding up the small one is not from the same picture set, and in that case that hoax of a production company would have fabricated THREE models, whereas there is a supposedly urban legend about one model-induced television-imbibed Matrix stupor! READ "THE TOMBSTONE EPITAPH" from April 26 1890, about a 160 feet (> 50 meter) wingspan size Pterodactyl encounter BY CLICKING ON THE ARTICLE Read about a Bird the size of a plane in Alaska
VISIT OUR "EVOLUTION
IRRITATION" SITE & DISCOVER WHY Unlocking The Mystery Of Life -Watch the Scientific Case for Intelligent Design1 hr 7 min 5 sec - Apr 24,
2006
| |||
| ||